Key takeaways
- A coach gives you information and insider truth. A champion actively does things just for you and leans in and fights when someone says no.
- Access to power and vested interest are weak tests. The real test is observable advocacy, such as setting up internal meetings or circulating your business case.
- Give every stakeholder two labels: a stable functional role and a behavioral label of Contact, Coach, Champion or Blocker that can change over the deal.
- Build champion behavior across multiple functional levels, because a deal that depends on one person is one reorg or priority shift away from a stall.
On this page
The Champion Test: One Question That Changes EverythingWhy Traditional “Champion” Thinking BreaksWhere the Confusion Starts: Function vs. BehaviorThe Framework: Functional Roles and Behavioral LabelsDon’t Bet the Deal on One ChampionWhy This Changes Your PipelineHow to Apply This in Your Next DealFrequently Asked QuestionsThe Bottom LineThere is a moment in almost every deal where a seller makes a quiet (sometimes vocal), yet consequential mistake. It doesn’t look like a mistake at the time.
You walk out of a call feeling great. The prospect was engaged. They shared real pain. They may even say, “I want to make this happen.” You update the CRM, mark the champion field, and tell your manager you’ve got a great champ.
Six weeks later, the deal is dead.
Your “champion” stopped returning emails. Turns out they liked you, gave you good information, and genuinely wanted to help. But when it came time to defend your solution in a room full of skeptics, they sat quietly. When leadership asked if this was a priority, they didn’t fight.
You didn’t have a champion. You had a coach.
And that confusion is one of the most expensive mistakes in B2B selling.
This is also one of the top reasons deals stall. (For the full breakdown, see our article on why deals stall.) But the champion problem deserves its own conversation because the fix requires a different way of thinking about stakeholders, and a better way of proving advocacy.
The Champion Test: One Question That Changes Everything
Most definitions of a champion sound right, but they fail in practice because they’re too easy to self-assign.
A common definition says a champion has three things: access to power, willingness to sell for you, and a vested interest in your solution.
But that definition creates more confusion than it solves.
Start with “access to power.” What is power?
- The Economic Buyer has budget power
- The Executive Sponsor has priority power
- The Problem Owner has decision-criteria power
- The Technical Buyer has security, integration, and operational-fit power
Quick note: If those terms aren’t part of your vocabulary yet, don’t worry, we’ll define all of them in the framework section below. For now, just focus on the point.
Every functional role has a different kind of power. So “access to power” doesn’t tell you anything useful once you already know their function.
The function is their power.
And “vested interest”? That’s often invisible from the outside. You can’t observe someone’s internal motivation, even if they share it with you, which is rare. You can only observe their actions.
So let’s evolve this way of looking at things.
Here’s the only test that matters
Are they actively doing things just for you?
Mobilizing. Selling. Aligning. Fighting. For YOU.
A champion isn’t proven by what they do when everyone agrees. They’re proven by what they do when someone says no.
When friction shows up, when people raise concerns, when finance or executives challenge ROI, when leadership asks “is this a priority?”…a coach goes quiet.
A champion leans in and fights.
The CRM mistake that kills deals
If you remember one thing, remember this: your CRM doesn’t need a “Champion” field. It needs an “Advocacy” field.
Because the only thing that predicts whether a deal will survive when you’re not in the room is whether someone inside is moving it forward without you.
Proof points you can actually observe
Here are a few behaviors that signal real champion behavior:
- They set up internal meetings you’re not in and come back with outcomes.
- They circulate your business case, ROI model, or decision narrative internally.
- They bring objections to you early, before they surface in your next meeting.
- They introduce skeptics early and prepare you for the conversation.
- They co-own next steps with deadlines, and progress happens between calls.
A coach says, “My boss has been talking about this for a while; and really cares about xyz.” That’s helpful intel, but it’s passive.
A champion says: “I set up time with my boss next Tuesday. I shared the business case we built. He wants to meet your team and see the ROI model.” That’s mobilization.
The difference between those two statements is the difference between a deal that stalls and a deal that closes.
And when those behaviors stop, it’s a signal. They may still like you, but they’re no longer acting like a champion.
The label isn’t permanent. It’s real-time evidence.
Why Traditional “Champion” Thinking Breaks
If you’ve been through enterprise sales training, you’ve heard the concept of a champion. MEDDICC talks about it. Challenger references it.
Most sellers treat “champion” as a label they assign after a good meeting.
So the box gets checked, the manager relaxes, and the deal looks safer than it is.
Then the deal goes dark, and someone finally asks the only question that matters:
“What did our champion actually do for us?”
If the answer is: they took calls, shared org intel, and said encouraging things…
You didn’t have a champion. You had a coach.
Where the Confusion Starts: Function vs. Behavior
Here’s the nuance most teams miss:
Champion isn’t a function. It’s a behavior.
Most methodologies blur two different things:
- the functional role someone plays in the decision (what they own)
- the behavioral label they’re exhibiting in your deal (what they’re doing)
A better way to run deals is simple:
Every stakeholder gets two labels. One for function. One for behavior.
- The function is stable.
- The behavior can change as the deal progresses.
The Framework: Functional Roles and Behavioral Labels
The Five Functional Roles (The “Gates”)
Every complex B2B deal involves some combination of these roles. Titles change across companies. These roles don’t.
Each role is a gate. Each gate unlocks something different.
- End User (Problem Gate): They live in the workflow and feel the pain firsthand. They make the problem real, specific, and undeniable.
- Problem Owner (Evaluation Gate): They’re accountable for solving the problem. They drive the evaluation, shape requirements, and define what “good” looks like.
- Technical Buyer (Feasibility Gate): They own integration, security, data, and operational fit. They shape criteria whether you’re involved or not.
- Executive Sponsor (Priority Gate): They protect the initiative, make it a priority, and provide air cover when other projects compete for attention.
- Economic Buyer (Funding Gate): They can allocate budget at your price point. This isn’t always the CFO. It’s whoever controls discretionary spend at the deal’s level.
If your deal is stuck, you’re usually missing a gate, or you engaged the gates in the wrong order.
The Four Behavioral Labels
Regardless of function, every stakeholder in your deal is showing one of four behavioral patterns. These aren’t titles. They’re earned through evidence.
- Contact (Neutral): They’ll take meetings, answer questions, and may even be helpful. But if they’re giving the same access and information to every vendor, they’re neutral.
- Coach (Insight): They give you insider truth, how decisions get made, what objections are coming, how budget works, who matters. Coaches help you navigate, but they aren’t spending political capital for you.
- Champion (Advocacy): They’re actively doing things just for you. They mobilize, sell internally, defend the initiative under resistance, and create movement between meetings.
- Blocker (Resistance): They can slow, derail, or veto, usually because of risk, disruption, or loss of control. Avoiding them is how sellers get surprised. Engaging them is how you turn them into a neutral contact, or more.
Don’t Bet the Deal on One Champion
Sometimes you’ll have a primary internal advocate. Great.
But if your deal depends on one person, you’re one reorg, one priority shift, one skeptical stakeholder away from a stall.
The better objective is to build champion behavior across the functional chain:
- End users advocating that the current state is unacceptable
- Problem owners translating your differentiators into requirements
- Technical buyers validating feasibility and shaping criteria in your favor
- Executive sponsors making it a priority now
- Economic buyers funding it because the case is undeniable
One champion is fragile. Multi-level advocacy is resilient.
And you typically won’t see true champion behavior in week one. Early on, people are forming opinions. Champion behavior usually emerges mid to late stage, after conviction is built through evidence.
So early on, focus on identifying coaches and developing advocacy. Label everyone honestly, then watch for the shift.
Why This Changes Your Pipeline
When you apply this model, three things happen immediately:
- Your forecast gets honest. Deals where the “champion” is actually a coach show up as higher risk.
- Your strategy sharpens. If you have a coach but not a champion, your next move isn’t to wait. It’s to build advocacy and expand coverage to the missing gates.
- Surprises disappear. Most deals that “randomly” stall weren’t random. They were under-advocated, single-threaded, or missing a gate.
A simple way to track it is a color-coded assessment:
- Red: only contacts, no meaningful coaching or advocacy
- Yellow: coaches exist, early advocacy at mid/low levels, not proven under resistance
- Green: verified champion behavior at the right functional levels
How to Apply This in Your Next Deal
- Step 1: Give every stakeholder two labels. Functional role (End User, Problem Owner, Technical Buyer, Executive Sponsor, Economic Buyer) and behavioral label (Contact, Coach, Champion, Blocker).
- Step 2: Identify your strongest coach. Who is giving you the most insider truth? That’s your coach. Now ask: are they creating movement without you?
- Step 3: Test for advocacy. Give them a task that requires internal action: “Can you share this business case with your VP before Thursday and bring back feedback?” “Can you pull in security now so we don’t get surprised later?”
- Step 4: Build advocacy across the gates. Don’t stop at one internal supporter. Develop champion behavior at multiple functional levels so the deal survives even when you’re not in the room.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a coach become a champion?
Yes. Behavioral labels are earned and can change over the life of a deal. A contact can become a coach as they share more intelligence. A coach can become a champion once they start spending political capital and advocating internally.
The shift usually happens as conviction builds. They see competitors, believe in the change, and feel confident your solution is the right one. Your job is to help them build that conviction through evidence.
What if my champion loses influence?
It happens. Priorities shift. Reorgs happen. A champion who was powerful last month can become a neutral contact after a leadership change.
That’s why you need to observe champion behavior as a continuous signal, not a one-time label. It’s also why developing champions at multiple functional levels matters. If your entire deal depends on one person’s influence, you’re always one org change away from a stall.
Should I be looking for one champion or multiple?
Multiple. The old “find a champion” model was built for simpler buying environments. In modern consensus deals, your goal is to develop champion behaviors at every functional level.
The more people actively doing things just for you across the functional chain, the more resilient and faster your deal becomes.
What’s the most common mistake sellers make with champions?
Labeling someone a champion after one good meeting. Enthusiasm and helpfulness are not advocacy.
Champion is a high bar. Reserve the word until someone is actively doing things just for you: mobilizing stakeholders, defending your solution, moving the deal forward when you’re not in the room.
As a rule: if you’re thinking they’re your champion instead of observing consistent action, you’re at risk of getting blindsided.
The Bottom Line
The difference between a sales champion and a coach isn’t semantic. It’s structural.
Coaches give you information. Champions create outcomes.
The fix is simple: separate function from behavior, and only label champions based on observable advocacy, proven under resistance.
For the complete stakeholder framework, including stakeholder gates, the field-to-middle-to-top engagement model, and the evidence-based system that ties it all together, see my book Deal Management: The Hidden Reasons Sales Stall and the Evidence-Based System to Win More, available now in hardcover and Kindle. You can also talk to DealDoc today for help installing the right Deal Management system inside your org.
The best sellers don’t “find” a champion.
They build champion behavior across the deal and create momentum that survives when they’re not in the room.